SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 95 OF 2021
 
IN
CC/379/2013
1. SIVARAMA SARMA JONNALAGADDA & ANR.,
...........Appellants(s)
Versus 
1. M/s MARUTHI CORPORATION LIMITED & ANR.,
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL,PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE DR. S.M. KANTIKAR,MEMBER

For the Appellant :
For the Respondent :

Dated : 08 Nov 2021
ORDER

These Applications, under Section 60 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (for short, the “Act”), have been filed by the Opposite Parties praying for review of the common Order, dated 21.09.2021, passed by this Commission wherein the Consumer Complaint Nos. 379 of 2013, 411 of 2019 and 791 of 2019, were partly allowed directing the Opposite Parties to refund the amount deposited by the Complainants along with interest @ 9% p.a. from the respective dates of deposit till the date of actual refund. It was observed as under:-

“           Having given our thoughtful consideration to the various pleas raised by the learned Counsel for the Parties, we find that the Construction of the two Villas which were to be constructed by the Opposite Parties on Plot Nos. 129 and 130 have not yet been

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top