[RBT/CC/17/892]

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES

REDRESSALCOMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI

CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. RBT/ CC/17/ 892

in

CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO.CC/12/18

M/s CLASSIQUE,

A partnership firm,

Having its office at:

AF 1/2, Al-meen Complex,

Cujira, Santa Cruz,

Goa 403 005.

Through its partner

Mr.VijayUmershi Jobanputra.

...........Complainant

Versus

ROYAL PALMS (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,

Survey No.169, Aarey Milk Colony,

Near Unit No.26, Goregaon (East),

Mumbai 400 065.

Through Managing Director

............Opponent(s)

BEFORE:

D.R.SHIRASAO, PRESIDING JUDICIAL MEMBER

DR.S.K.KAKADE, MEMBER

For the

Complainant(s):

Advocate Mr.Nikhil Karnavat

For the

Opponent(s):

None.

ORDER

Per Dr.S.K.Kakade, Hon’ble Member:

[RBT/CC/17/892]

1. The complainant, partnership firm had approached this State

Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission of Maharashtra Mumbai

for seeking Redressal of dispute between it and developer Royal

palms (India) Private Limited by filing consumer complaint number

CC/12 /18. The State Consumer Commission, Mumbai dismissed

the complaint by order dated 7^th October 2016, holding that the

complainant is not “consumer” as per de

Click Here to Read the rest of this document