SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
REVISION PETITION NO. 1060 OF 2014
 
(Against the Order dated 21/11/2013 in Appeal No. 453/2013 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh)
1. NEW HOLLAND FIAT (INDIA) PVT. LTD.
B-19 MIDC RANJAMGAON, TAL SHIRPUR,
DISTRICT: PUNE - 412210
MAHARASHTRA
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. PENDLI UPENDER REDDY & 2 ORS.
S/O VENKATRAM REDDY, R/O HOUSE NO- 1-8-134, BALASUNDRA, HANANKONDA , PRESENTLY AT:H.NO-1-7-1119, ADVOCATES COLONY,HANAMKONDA ,
DISTRICT: WARANGAL
A.P
2. AUTOFIN LTD
BOWENPELLY, REP BY MANAGING PARTNER,
SECUNERABAD
A.P
3. SELECT MOTOR,
MULUGU ROAD, REP BY ITS MANAGER,
WARANGAL
A.P
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL,PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. M. SHREESHA,MEMBER

For the Petitioner :
Mr. A Naveen Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondent :
Mrs. K. Radha, Advocate

Dated : 19 Nov 2019
ORDER

Per Mrs. M. Shreesha, Member

          Challenge in this Revision Petition under Section 21 (b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short “the Act”) is to the order dated 21.11.2013, passed by Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Hyderabad (in short, “the State Commission”), whereby the Sta

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top