R.K. AGRAWAL, J. PRESIDENT

1.       By these three Revision Petitions, the Original Complainants (hereinafter referred to as the Petitioners) call in question the legality and correctness of a common Order dated 10.10.2013, passed by the Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission at Hyderabad (hereinafter referred to as the State Commission) in First Appeals No. 715/2012, 716/2012 and 717/2012 respectively.  By the Impugned Order, the State Commission has dismissed the Appeals, preferred by the Petitioners herein against three different Orders, all dated 31.07.2012, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-II, Hyderabad (hereinafter referred to as the District Commission) in Complaint Cases No. 276/2008, 277/2008 and 292/2008 respectively.  By the said Orders, the District Commission held that the Opposite Parties/Respondents had received the entire sale consideration but not registered the sale deed in the name of the Petitioners and, therefore, there was deficiency in service on the part of the Opposite Parties/Respondents.  Consequently, the District allowed the Complaints, preferred by the Petitioners herein, and directed as under:

RP/1064/2014

          “In the result, the complaint of the complainant is allowed in part directing the opposite parties to pay the complainant a sum of Rs.1,75,000/- received by them along with interest @ 9% p.a. from the date of the complaint till the realization and also direct to pay a sum of Rs.10,000/- towards compensation for mental agony and further direct to pay a sum of Rs.3,000/- towards costs.  Time for compliance: 40 days from the date of receipt o