BEFORE THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

BEFORE :       Hon’ble Dr. Justice S. TAMILVANAN                         PRESIDENT

Thiru K. BASKARAN                                                               JUDICIAL MEMBER 

R.P.NO.11/2015

(Against order in CMP.No.165/2014 in CC No.258/2012 on the file of the DCDRF, Chennai (North)

DATED THIS THE 3^rd DAY OF NOVEMBER 2017

1.       Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.,

Nelson Mandela Road

Vasant Kunj,

New Delhi 110 070

Rep. by its Managing Director

2.       Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.,

Chennai Regional Office

7th Floor, Capital Towers                     M/s. S. Ramasubramaniam Associates        

180 Kodambakkam High Road                                 Counsel for

Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034          Petitioners/ 1 & 2Opposite parties

                  Vs.

1.       Sheik Nagoor Meeran

          107, Malayathammankoil Street                    M/s. T.Ravikumar, Counsel for

          Mannurpet, Chennai- 600                            1^st  Respondent / Complainant

2.       M/s. ABT Maruthi

          (A Division of ABT Ltd.,)

          C-20, II Main Road

          Ambattur Industrial Estate                                   (Served absent)

          Ambattur, Chennai – 600 058                 2^nd Respondent/3^rd Opposite party

          This Revision Petition is filed praying to set aside the order of the District Forum in CMP.No.165/2014 in CC.No.258/2012 dt.21.11.2014 praying for a direction for the inspection of the vehicle by the panel of expert service/ technical engineers of Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., which was dismissed. 

          This Revision petition coming on before us for hearing finally today, upon hearing the arguments of the counsel appearing on bothside, this commission made the following order in the open court.

Dr. JUSTICE S.TAMILVANAN,   PRESIDENT    (Open Court)

1.       This Revision Petition is filed praying to set aside the order of the District Forum, Chennai (North), dismissing CMP.No.165/2014 in CC.No.258/2012.

2.       The Revision petitioners/Opposite parties filed a petition before the District Forum, praying for the following relief:

          1.       allow this petition

          2.       Pass necessary directions to the complainant to produce the vehicle at the designated place and time for carrying inspection which shall be informed by this opposite party in writing

          3.       pass such other and further orders/ directions as this Hon’ble forum may deem fit and proper.

3.       It is not in dispute that a petition has been filed by the respondents herein in CMP.No.166/2012 order dt.27.9.2013, praying for the inspection of vehicle, in which the District Forum has passed an order by allowing the said petition as follows:

          In the result, this CMP is allowed and the car bearing Registration No.TN 20 BS 4334 is ordered to be sent to the Head of the Department of Automobile Engineering, Madras Institute of Technology, Chrompet to be examined by the Head of the Department and to get an expert opinion.  The petitioner/ com