SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
REVISION PETITION NO. 1248 OF 2010
 
(Against the Order dated 09/12/2009 in Appeal No. 1670/2009 of the State Commission Haryana)
1. HUDA & ANR.
Through its Chief Administrator, Sector - 6
Panchkula
Haryana
2. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Through its Estate Officer
Panchkula
Haryana
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. KESAR SINGH
Resident of Village Nada Sahib
Panchkula
Haryana
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN,PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. M. SHREESHA,MEMBER

For the Petitioner :MS. ANUBHA AGRAWAL
For the Respondent :
Mr.Shoaib Khan, Advocate

Dated : 06 Feb 2018
ORDER

O R D E R (ORAL)

        Challenge in this Revision Petition under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short “the Act”), by Haryana Urban Development Authority (for short “HUDA”) is to the order dated 9.12.2009, passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Haryana at Panchkula (for short “the State Commission”) in FA/1670/2009.  By the impugned order, the State Commission has affirmed the order dated 1.10.2009, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Panchkula (for short “the D

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top