HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED vs DAYA KRISHAN PANDEY

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation


NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI


REVISION PETITION NO. 1374 OF 2013

(Against the Order dated 03/01/2013 in Appeal No. 366/2008 of the State Commission Punjab)

1. HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED
FORMELY KNOWN AS HINDUSTHAN LEVER LTD, NO-165/166 BACK BAY RECLAMATION
MUMBAI - 400 020
MAHARASTRA

...........Petitioner(s)

Versus

1. DAYA KRISHAN PANDEY
HOUSE NO-1101/T-3, SECTOR-3, TALWARA
HOSHIARPUR
PUNJAB

...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
	HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT BHARIHOKE,PRESIDING MEMBER
	HON'BLE MRS. REKHA GUPTA,MEMBER

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Gaurab Banerji, Sr. Advocate
Assisted by Ms. Rukhmini Bobde, Advocate

For the Respondent :

Mr. B.S. Sharma, Advocate

Dated : 19 Apr 2017

ORDER

By this order we propose to dispose above-noted revision petitions involving similar question of law and fact. For the sake of convenience we treat the file of revision petition No.1049/2013 as the lead file.

2. Briefly stated, facts relevant for the disposal of the revision petitions are that the petitioner/opposite party No.1 of respective petitions during the year 2006 to February, 2007 advertised its promotion-cum-sale scheme for their product “Surf Excel” washing powe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document