SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Vazhuthacaud,Thiruvananthapuram
 
Revision Petition No. RP/13/361
(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. 529/09 of District Trissur)
 
1. Santhakumari
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Nandipulam Service Co-operative Bank, Mukundapuram
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE SRI P.Q.BARKATH ALI PRESIDENT
  SRI. V. V. JOSE MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

KERALA  STATE  CONSUMER  DISPUTES  REDRESSAL  COMMISSION

                    VAZHUTHACADU    THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

                            

    REVISION PETITION:  361 /2013

ORDER DTD: 03/01/14

 (Against the order in CC.529/2009  on the file of CDRF, Thrissur,  dt: 31.05.2013)

 

PRESENT

JUSTICE SHRI.P.Q. BARKATH ALI:                           PRESIDENT

SHRI.V.V. JOSE:                                                             MEMBER

 

Santhakumari.,

W/o. Thaniparambil  Kuttappan,                 

Nandipulam, Kukundapuram Taluk,                      REV. PETITIONER

Thrissur-680 312

 

(By Adv. Sri. Vinay Menon & Arun P. Nair)

 

V/s.

 

Nandipulam Service Co-operative Bank,      

No. R-2,  Mukundapuram,                                       RESPONDENT

Thrissur – 680 312

R/by its Secretary.

 

(By Adv. Sri. Padmini)

 

                                                                   ORDER

 

JUSTICE SHRI.P.Q. BARKATH ALI:        PRESIDENT

 

          This Revision Petition is filed against the order of the CDRF, Thrissur, in IA 364/13, IA 365/13 inCC 529/09 dated 31/05/13.

 

 

          The complainant has filed the complaint before the Forum alleging that the opposite parties Nandipulam Service Co-operative Bank, Mukundapuram had charged excessive interest for the cash credit loan taken by her.  The Power of Attorney holder of complainant was examined and documents were marked by the Forum and the case has posted for the opposite party’s evidence.  At that time complainant filed the above patitions calling upon the opposite party to produce statement of accounts.  The Forum dismissed the petition stating that petitions are highly delated.

          Heard both the counsels.  We are also of the view that these positions are highly delated.  At the time of filing the complaint itself she could have asked for the statement of accounts.  Further she has not stated in complaint the rate of interest charged by the opposite parties.

          In all these reasons find no ground to admit the Revision Peition and the same is hereby dismissed.

          Both parties shall appear before the Forum on or before 31/01/2014.  Intimate the Forum.

 

JUSTICE P.Q. BARKATH ALI:        PRESIDENT

 

 

 

 

V.V. JOSE:                                         MEMBER

 

nb

 
 
[HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE SRI P.Q.BARKATH ALI]
PRESIDENT
 
[ SRI. V. V. JOSE]
MEMBER
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top