SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
REVISION PETITION NO. 173 OF 2011
 
(Against the Order dated 15/12/2010 in Appeal No. 1470/2010 of the State Commission Karnataka)
1. NEELAM SHANKAR & ANR.
No. G-3, Sri Balaji Residency, 12th Main, 17th Cross, BTM Layots
Bangalore - 560067
Karnataka
2. SAMUDRALA SUDERSHAN
No. 302, Tirumala Residency, 12th Cross, 2nd Main, 3rd Phase, J.P. Nagar
Bangalore - 560067
Karnataka
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. B.S. KUMAR & ANR.
No. 86/131, Govindappa Road, Basavanagudi
Bangalore - 560004
Karnataka
2. MR. H.S. VEENA
No. 86/131, Govindappa Road, Basavanagudi
Bangalore - 560004
Karnataka
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. MALIK, PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. VINAY KUMAR, MEMBER

For the Petitioner :
Mr. A.M. Pattiyani, Advocate
For the Respondent :
Mr. V.N. Raghupathy, Advocate

Dated : 07 Aug 2012
ORDER

JUSTICE J.M. MALIK 1. The main issue which falls for consideration is whether the Builder was supposed to install the Generator as well as the Transformer in the premises in dispute? This is now an admitted fact that the Generator has been installed. The petitioners pick up a conflict with the question that the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top