SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1 (RP/19/64)

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI

REVISION PETITION NO.RP/19/64

FIITJEE LTD.

Kalu Sarai, Sarvpriya Vihar,

Reg.Office 29A, Kalu Sarai

Sarvpriya Vihar,

New Delhi 110 016.

Also at-

Ujagar Complex,

Opp.Deonar Bus Depot,

Off Sion Trombay Road,

Deonar, Chembur East,

Mumbai.

Through its authorized representative

Mridul Pathak

Petitioner/applicant

versus

Kapil Dev

R/o Sindhu 22

New Mandala, BARC Colony,

Anushakti Nagar, Mumbai.

Respondent(s)

BEFORE:

Hon’ble Mr.Justice A.P.Bhangale, President

Hon’ble Dr.S.K.Kakade, Member

PRESENT:

For the Petitioner: Advocate Shri.Gavhane

For the Respondent: Advocate Pravin Tembhekar

ORAL ORDER

Per: Hon’ble Mr.Justice A.P.Bhangale, President

[1]

Heard. By this revision petition petitioner have questioned legality,

prosperity and correctness of the impugned order dated 03/01/2019 passed

in CC/18/85 whereby the learned Addl. Consumer Disputes Redressal

Forum, Mumbai Suburban District, Bandra(E), Mumbai 400 051 proceeded

to pas

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top