SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img


NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
REVISION PETITION NO. 2200 OF 2010
(Against the Order dated 05/03/2010 in Appeal No. 62/2009 of the State Commission Rajasthan)
1. KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD.
Regd. Office 36-38A, Nariman Bhawan, Nariman Point
Mumbai - 21
Maharashtra
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus
1. CHETAN KUMAR JAIN & ANR
R/o. Seth Kanwar Lal Ji Ka Nohra, Rampura
Kota
Rajasthan
2. CHANDER PRAKASH JAIN, S/O. LATE SH. PREM CHAND JAIN
R/o. Seth Kanwar Lal Ji Ka Mohra, Rampura
Kota
Rajasthan
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. BATTA ,PRESIDING MEMBER

For the Petitioner :NEMO
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 18 Aug 2010
ORDER
Heard counsel for the petitioner. There are concurrent findings of two fora below. In fact, loan of Rs.10,00,000/- was sanctioned, out of which Rs.9,00,000/- was disbursed to the complainant. The balance Rs.1,00,000/- was to be disbursed later. The Bank had issued a cheque for Rs.87,775/- towards balance loan of Rs.1,00,000/- after deducting PEMII amounting to Rs.12,225/-. The State Commission has observed that the Bank has not produced evidence to show that cheque for the sa






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top