SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
REVISION PETITION NO. 2522 OF 2013
 
(Against the Order dated 20/03/2013 in Appeal No. 720/2010 of the State Commission Maharashtra)
1. PRAVIN G. JOSHI & 3 ORS.
R/O PLOT NO-29, SHAILESH CO-OP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. KARVE NAGAR,
PUNE - 411 052
MAHARASTRA
2. SANJAY V.WALSANGKAR
R/O PLOT NO-29, SHAILESH CO-OP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. KARVE NAGAR,
PUNE - 4110 52
MAHARASTRA
3. BALKRUSHNA H.SARAWADE,
R/O PLOT NO-29, SHAILESH CO-OP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. KARVE NAGAR,
PUNE - 4110 52
MAHARASTRA
4. SANJAY G.PARANJAPE,
R/O PLOT NO-29, SHAILESH CO-OP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. KARVE NAGAR,
PUNE - 4110 52
MAHARASTRA
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. SAROJINI GANGADHAR & 3 ORS.
R/O PUSHKARAJ, PLOT NO-10, GANESH HSG SOCIETY KALYAN RASTRA, BHIVANDI,
THANE
MAHARASTRA
2. M/S GAJANAN CONSTRUCTION , A PARTNERSHIP FIRM,
THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, HAVING OFF AT JAYADRI, 10 MUKUND NAGAR, TAPOBHUMI CO OP HSG SOCIETY,
PUNE - 411 037
MAHARASTRA
3. SHRI SAMIR PRABHAKAR ACHARYA,
ANUBANDH, C-43 PARANJIPE SCHEME BLDG, SATTAWADI , NEAR DANDEKAR BRIDGE, SINGGARH ROAD,
PUNE
MAHARASTRA
4. SHAILESH CO-OP HSG SCO LTD. THROUGH ITS SECRETARY,
HAVING ITS OFFICE AT SHAILESH SABHAGRUHA, S.NO -39/2 & 40/2, SMARTHA PATH,NEAR ALANKAR POLICE STATION, KARVENAGAR,
PUNE - 411 052
MAHARASTRA
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL,PRESIDENT

For the Petitioner :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ankur Gupta, Advocate
For the Respondent :
For the Respondents : Mr. Rohan S. Darandale, Advocate

Dated : 22 Feb 2022
ORDER

1.       Challenge in this Revision Petition, under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short “the Act”), by the Petitioners/Complainants, is to the Common Order dated 20.03.2013, passed by the Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, at Mumbai (for short “the State Commission”) in First Appeal No. A/10/720, A/10/77 and A/10/1040. By the Impugned Order, the State Commission while dismissing the Appeal No. 720/2010 filed by the Complainants has partly allowed the Appeal Nos. 779 and 1040 of 2010 filed by the Respondent Nos. 1 and 4 respectively.

2.       Succinctly put, dispute prevailing between the parties in this case is with respect to use of substantial open space surrounding the Building in question. It is averred that the Petitioners/Complainants have been prevented from using and enjoying the aforesaid open space as the Respondent No. 1 has covered the open space by erecting iron grill.

3.       Detailed factual matrix as penned in the Complaint is that the Respondent no 4, Shailesh Co-Operative Housing Society, is a Society registered under the provisions of Maharashtra Co-Operative Societies Act,1960 in the year 1969 (hereinafter referred to as the “Society”) and the Petitioners and Respondent No.1 are its Members. The Society is in possession of a piece of land situated at S.No. 39/2 + 40/2, Maharshi Karve Nagar, Pune.  The said land was divided into sub-plots and one of the such plots bearing No. 29 admeasuring 338.63 sq. mtrs. was allotted to Respondent no.1, Mrs. Sarojini Gangadhar, on lease for 999 years. The Society also executed a registered Lease Deed in her favour, however, construction was not done by her on the said plot for a long period of time. Subsequently, a Resolution was passed by the Society on 09.11.1986 allowing the plot owners/its Members to construct multi-storied Building on the plots allotted to them. It was also decided by the Society that a Society within Society (to be called new Society) would be formed and each Flat Purchaser would pay ₹10,000/- to the Society for transferring the right, title and interest and as such all the Flat Purchaser would become nominal Members of the Society.

4.       The Respondent No.1, owner of Plot No.29, entered into a Development Agreement with one, Late Vinayak Shridhar Deshpande on 29.07.1986 who in turn transferred his rights of development in favour of Respondent No.2 Partnership Firm, M/s Gajanan Const

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top