SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
REVISION PETITION NO. 2547 OF 2017
 
(Against the Order dated 17/05/2017 in Appeal No. 828/2016 of the State Commission Haryana)
1. AIR INDIA (NACIL)
THROUGH STATION MANAGER, SCO 162-164, SECTOR 34-A,
CHANDIGARH
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. ASHOK KUMAR SINGLA & ANR.
R/O. HOUSE NO. H-132, SECTOR 10, DLF,
FARIDABAD
HARYANA
2. M/S. TSS TRAVELS AND TOURS PVT. LTD.,
B 517, FIRST FLOOR, NEHRU GROUNDS
FAIRDABAD
HARYANA
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. PREM NARAIN,PRESIDING MEMBER

For the Petitioner :
Ms Shreya Sethi, Advocate
For the Respondent :
For Respondent no.1 NEMO (Served)
For Respondent no.2 NEMO (Served)

Dated : 19 Aug 2019
ORDER

None is present on behalf of the respondents though notices have been served to both the respondents, therefore, they are proceeded ex parte.

2.     Learned counsel for the petitioner has been heard. She states that the respondent/ complainant had booked an Air India flight ticket from Delhi to Mumbai for 27th May 2012 for Rs.4640/-. The flight was cancelled due to the strike of the pilots. As the respondent no.1/ complainant had purchased the ticket from respondent no.2, howeve

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top