SHYAM PROMOTERS BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS vs SONALI BHATTACHARYA & ANR.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation


NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI


REVISION PETITION NO. 2797 OF 2011

(Against the Order dated 24/05/2011 in Appeal No. 319/2010 of the State Commission Chhattisgarh)

1. SHYAM PROMOTERS BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS
Shri parshuram Nagar, House no - B-9 Behind Minig Office, Gram Puraina, Ring Road No -1
Raipur
CG

...........Petitioner(s)

Versus

1. SONALI BHATTACHARYA & ANR.
W/o Shri Ashish Bhattacharya, R/o Quater no,H-5,PWD Office Campus, Behind Campus Akashwani, Civil Lines
Raipur
CG
2. H.K Sharma
House No -B-9Behidn Minig Office, Gram Puraina , Ring Road No-1
Raipur
CG

...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
	HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PRESIDING MEMBER
	HON'BLE MRS. REKHA GUPTA, MEMBER

For the Petitioner :

Mohd. Anis Ur Rehman, Advocate

For the Respondent :

For the Respondent No.1 : In person with her husband
For the Respondent No.2 : Nemo

Dated : 20 Mar 2013

ORDER

Respondent no.2 has refused to accept the notice. This is sufficient service. Since, there is no appearance of respondent no.2, he is proceeded ex-parte. It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioner and respondent no.1, who is present in person, that they have amicably settled the matter. In

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :