SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
REVISION PETITION NO. 3089 OF 2011
 
(Against the Order dated 27/05/2011 in Appeal No. 641/2008 of the State Commission Punjab)
1. SARABJIT SINGH
S/o Shri Rohsan Singh, R/o House No-1-A Shaheed Udham Singh
Jalandhar
Punjab
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. ESTATAE OFFICER, PUDA
Punjab Urban Planning developmentAuthority, Lodowali Road
Jalandhar
Punjab
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN, PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. VINEETA RAI, MEMBER

For the Petitioner :
Mr.Dinesh Verma, Advocate
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 23 Nov 2011
ORDER

Petitioner purchased a shop-cum-office site in an open auction on 10.4.2001 for Rs.45,80,000/-.  25% of the auction money was deposited on the spot.  Remaining amount was to be paid in 4 equal instalments along with interest.  On inspection, the petitioner found that there was a heavy-duty electricity transformer installed at the backside of the allotted SCO.  Petitioner requested the respondent to remove the transformer and for delivery of possession.  Legal Notice was issued on 20.3.2003.  Since no relief was given, the petitioner filed the complaint on 6.2.2006.

    

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top