JILA SAHKARI KENDRIYA MARYADIT BANK vs NIRMALA RANI UPADHAYA & ANR.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation


NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI


REVISION PETITION NO. 3107 OF 2015

(Against the Order dated 03/09/2015 in Appeal No. 2352/2014 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)

1. JILA SAHKARI KENDRIYA MARYADIT BANK
THROUGH BRANCH MANAGER AMANAT BRANCH NEXT TO POLICE STATION SEONI TEHSEEL AND DISTRICT
SEONI
M.P.

...........Petitioner(s)

Versus

1. NIRMALA RANI UPADHAYA & ANR.
WD/O LATE CHANDRIKA PRASAD, OPPOSITE SATYA KABIR NIKETEN CILLEGE ROAD,BHAIROGANJ
SEONI
M.P.
2. SANJEEV KUMAR UPADHAYA
S/O LATE CHANDRIKA PRASAD, OPPOSITE SATYA KABIR NIKETEN CILLEGE ROAD,BHAIROGANJ
SEONI
M.P.

...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
	HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN,PRESIDING MEMBER

For the Petitioner :

MR. RITESH KHARE

For the Respondent :

NEMO

Dated : 06 Sep 2016

ORDER

JUSTICE V.K. JAIN (ORAL)

No one is present for the respondents - Nirmala Rani Upadhaya and Sanjeev Kumar Upadhaya. The notice sent to them by Regd. Post have been returned with the endorsement “refused to accept”. The refusal to accept the notice, when tendered by the postman, amounts to a valid service and, therefore, the respondents are deemed to have been duly served. I have heard the learned counsel for the petition

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :