SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
REVISION PETITION NO. 3271 OF 2010
 
(Against the Order dated 25/06/2009 in Appeal No. 435/2006 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh)
1. A. SRINIVASA RAO
D. No. 11-94, Gudiwada Colony, Paderu
Visakhapatnam - 531024
Andhra Pradesh
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. SR. DIVISIONAL COMMERCIAL MANAGER, EAST COAST RAILWAY
Sr. Divisional Commerical Manager, East Coast Railway
Visakapatnam
Andhra Pradesh
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. SURESH CHANDRA, PRESIDING MEMBER

For the Petitioner :NEMO
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 07 Feb 2011
ORDER

None is present for the petitioner even at the second call.  In this case, the Registry had issued notice to the petitioner for removal of certain defects noticed in the revision petition.  The same have not been removed as yet and the petitioner is also not present today.  It appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the revision petition.  The same, therefore, stands dismissed for default.       

 

 
......................
SURESH CHANDRA
PRESIDING MEMBER
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top