THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER AND ORS. vs R. DHIRAVIDAMANI AND ANR.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation


NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI


REVISION PETITION NO. 3763 OF 2011

(Against the Order dated 12/07/2011 in Appeal No. 11/2011 of the State Commission Tamil Nadu)

1. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER AND ORS.
Tamil Electrcity Board, Aravakurichi ,
Karur
Tamil Nadu
2. The Astt Executive Engineer, Operation & Maintance ( South)
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board,
Karur
Tamil Nadu
3. The Superitending Engineer, Operation & Maintance (General)
Tamil Nadu Electricty Board
Karur
Tamil Nadu

...........Petitioner(s)

Versus

1. R. DHIRAVIDAMANI AND ANR.
W/o S.P Ragunathan, R/o 27/1 Andimedu, Aravakurichi
Karur
Tamil Nadu
2. S.P Raghunathan, S/o Pichaunuthu
R/o 27/1 Andimedu, Aravakuruchi
Karur
Tamil Nadu

...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
	HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PRESIDING MEMBER

For the Petitioner :

Mr. V. Senthil Kumar, Advocate

For the Respondent :

Dated : 12 Dec 2013

ORDER

Heard. Since, a paltry sum of Rs.5,,000/- only, is involved in the present case, this Commission is not inclined to entertain this petition in view of the decision of the Apex Court in urgaon Gramin Bank Vs. Khazani and another, IV (2012) CPJ 5 (SC), where Apex Court observed; . Number of litigations in our count

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :