HUDA & ANR. vs NARINDER SINGH

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation


NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI


REVISION PETITION NO. 4236 OF 2011

(Against the Order dated 05/10/2011 in Appeal No. 1778/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)

1. HUDA & ANR.
Through Its Chief Adminstrator, Sector-6
Panchkula
Haryana
2. Haryana Urban Developemtn Authority
Through its Estate Officer
Ambala
Haryana

...........Petitioner(s)

Versus

1. NARINDER SINGH
S/o Sh Ram Singh, R/o House No-567, Sector-9,Urban Estate
Ambala
Haryana

...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
	HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN,PRESIDENT
	HON'BLE MRS. M. SHREESHA,MEMBER

For the Petitioner :

MR. VIVEK GUPTA

For the Respondent :

MR. BRIJENDER KAUSHIK

Dated : 06 Feb 2018

ORDER

O R D E R (ORAL)

Challenge in this Revision Petition, under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short “the Act”), by Haryana Urban Development Authority (for short “HUDA”) is to the order dated 5.10.2011, passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Haryana at Panchkula (for short “the State Commission”) in FA/1778/2007. By the impugned order, the State Commission has affirmed the order dated 22.5.2007, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Ambala (for sh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :