SHAILENDRA KUMAR BAJPAI vs KULDEEP SAXENA & 2 ORS.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation


NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI


REVISION PETITION NO. 593 OF 2021

(Against the Order dated 18/02/2021 in Appeal No. 1117/2008 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)

1. SHAILENDRA KUMAR BAJPAI

...........Petitioner(s)

Versus

1. KULDEEP SAXENA & 2 ORS.

...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
	HON'BLE DR. S.M. KANTIKAR,PRESIDING MEMBER
	HON'BLE MR. BINOY KUMAR,MEMBER

For the Petitioner :

Appeared at the time of arguments

For the Petitioner : Mr. Pratul Srivastava, Advocate

For the Respondent :

Dated : 08 Jun 2022

ORDER

Pronounced on: 8^th June 2022

ORDER

DR. S. M. KANTIKAR, PRESIDING MEMBER

1. The present Revision Petition has been filed by the Petitioner (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Opposite Party No. 1) under Section 58(1)(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the Order dated 18.02.2021, wherein the U.P. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Lucknow (hereinafter referred to as the “State Commission”), dismissed the Appeal and upheld the Order passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kanpur Nagar (hereinafter referred to as the “District Forum”) in Consumer Complaint No. 413/2005.

2. Brief facts that the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :