BEFORE THE TELANGANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION : HYDERABAD.

RP.NO. 76 OF 2018

Between :

1.   M/s. India Info Line Housing

Finance Limited, O/o 5-9-22/B/501,

5^th Floor, My Home Sarovar Plaza,

Saifabad, Secretariat Road, Hyderabad

500 004. Telangana State.

2. M/s. India Info Line Housing

Finance Limited, Rep by its CEO,

O/o. 12-A 10, 13^th Floor, Parinee,

Creesce, NDO, C-38 & 39, G-Block,

Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra East,

Mumbai 400 051.                                               

…Revision Petitioner /Opposite Party No. 1 & 2

AND

Sri. Sarath Babu Jasthi,

S/o. Sri. Vayunandan Rao,

Age 49 years, Occ: Business,

R/o. H.No.33, Vasanth Emerald

Gardens, Madhapur, Hyderabad 500 032,

Telengana State                                                       

 …Respondent / OP

Counsel for the Revision Petitioner/Opp. Party No. 1 & 2: Sri Siddharth                       

                                                                                         Chitturi 

Counsel for the Respondent/Complainant                      :   None

QUORUM:Hon’ble Sri   Justice M.S.K. Jaiswal  …  President

&

           K. Ramesh       … Member Judicial

Tuesday, the Twentieth day of November,

Two thousand Eighteen

REVISIION PETIITON FILED UNDER SECITON 17 (1) (B) OF THE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, 1986.

Oral Order :

The heard the points for consideration is whether the Revision Petitioner in maintable as order passed by District Consumer Forum in advisable  learned counsel  for petitioner at the time of admission and the following orders passed. 

     The revision petition is filed against the order passed by District Consumer Forum- III at Hyderabad   IA No 140 of 2018 in CC No.59 of 2018                             

       The Revision Petitioner herein are the Opposite parties in CC No.59 of 2018 and that they failed to file they written version consequently they were set expert  and the Revision petition IA No. 140 of 2018 to set aside they expert order and permit them to file written version. The Opposite parties/Complainant opposed application and after herein both sides the District Consumer Forum dismiss the application as it has no power to set aside expert order.                                               

The impugned order does not suffers any irregularity or illegality and does not require  interference of the Commission, since  the observation of the District Forum that the Forum does not have the power to set aside expert order is just and proper and the Commission also does not power to set aside order under revision  unlike the National Commission. Hence revision petition is dismissed as not maintainable 

However the petitioner may prefer an appeal challenge the original order passed by District Forum if so advised and petitioner may claim a benefit the Section 14 of the Limitation Act while preferring the appeal.

      PRESIDENT               MEMBER   

                  Dt.20.11.