1
Item No.1
BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL
CENTRAL ZONE BENCH, BHOPAL
(Through Video Conferencing)
Original Application No. 19/2021 (CZ)
Prabhat Mohan Pandey
Applicant(s)
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh
Respondent(s)
Through District Collector
Date of completion of hearing and reserving of order: 29.03.2022
Date of uploading of order on the website: 01.04.2022
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEO KUMAR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER
HON'BLE DR. ARUN KUMAR VERMA EXPERT MEMBER
For Applicant (s):
Mr. Rohit Sharma, Adv.
For Respondent(s) :
Mr. Sanjay Upadhyay Adv.
Mr. Sachin K. Verma, Adv.
Ms. Parul Bhadoria, Adv.
Mr. Salik Shafiqe, Adv.
Ms. Mansi Bachani, Adv.
Mr. Shubhendu Anand, Adv.
Mr. Ajay Dhawle, Adv.
ORDER
1.
The present original application has been filed raising a substantial
question relating to environment under Section 14 and 15 of the
National Green Tribunal, Act 2010. It is stated that in the year 2019, in
the state of Madhya Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh Sand (Mining,
Transportation, Storage and Trading) Rules, 2019 were introduced
wherein every district was awarded a single contractor or a group of
contractors and accordingly, the notice inviting tender (hereinafter
referred to as “NIT”) was floated by the State of Madhya Pradesh in the
month of October 2019. After acceptance of the technical and financial
bid, the contract for District of Chhindwara was awarded in favour of
Mr. Shishir Khandar. The Present application highlights various
anomalies occurred in the tender granted for the district of Chhindwara
2
of Madhya Pradesh whereby the contract for excavation of sand from 58
number of sand quarries in the district of Chhidwara was accorded in
favour of Mr. Shishir Khandar and out of the total 58 sand quarries, 24
sand quarries are operational.
2.
The issues involving substantial question relating to environment are as
under:
I.
There is a huge quantity mismatch in the sand for which tender
was floated and the sand for which Environment Clearance was
accorded thereby stimulating illegal and additional excavation of
Sand.
II.
Some of the sand quarries are not mentioned in the tender
documents but despite of that EC has been given over the same
and the contractor is carrying out mining activities over the same.
III. No District Survey Report has been prepared before starting the
operations of the sand quarries in the district of Chhindwara.
IV.
The scientific annual replenishment study which is mandatory as
per the MOEF Guidelines as well as various judgements of the
Hon’ble NGT and Apex Court, has not been conducted by the Non-
Applicant officials before starting the excavation of sand.
V.
No response to the complaints filed by Applicant from the Non-
Applicant officials, which establishes the fact that various
anomalies have been done as a result of which the environmental
loss
is
occurring
tremendously
on
daily
basis
and
the
environmental norms are being violated at the threshold.
3. The applicant had attached the list of matters where discrepancies in
sand mining which was found in excess of EC granted as compared to
Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) has been attached, which is as follows :
3
LIST OF ANS EC GRANTED OF DISTRICT CHHINDWARA SHOWING DISCRIPENCY
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
j
K
L
M
N
N.
S.N.
SEIAA
Minutes
n.
Date
Meeting
No.
Case No.
Panchayat
Name
Tehsil
Khasra
No.
in
EC
Khasra
No.
in
Tender
NIT
Area
as
per
EC
Area as
per
Tender
NIT
Cubic
Meters
as
Per
EC
Cubic Meters as
per Tender
NIT/Abhisuchna
dt. 30.07.2019
Discipency
Remark
1
6
26.06.2020 624
7159/20
Wadegaon Pandurna
426/2-
3-4
Not
mention
in NIT
1.73
Not
mention
in NIT
7000 Not mention in
NIT
Not
mention in
NIT
2
63 06.10.2020 643
7826/2020 Chaumau
Junnardo
85 Not
mention
in NIT
2
Not
mention
in NIT
5000 Not mention in
NIT
N
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.