SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

THE RAJASTHAN REAL ESTATE REGULAROTY AUTHORITY, JAIPUR. Complaint Number — RAJ-RERA-C-2020-3524 Dheeraj Jain ...Complainant VERSUS Shekhar Home Developers ...Respondent Present: Hon’ble Shri Salvinder Singh Sohata, Member 1. Adv. Abhay Jain, present on behalf of complainant through V.C. 2. Adv., Abhinav Bhandari, appeared on behalf of respondent Dated: 23.07.2021 Either of the party heard at length and examined the record of the case carefully. The factual matrix of the case is that a complaint was filed before the Authority alleging that flat No.FD.1-506, 5" floor in project = Shri Krishna Residency (Registration No. RAJ/P/2017/271) was booked in the year 2013. Applicant further : alleged that builder buyer agreement for the aforesaid unit was cuted on 02.11.2015. The expected delivery of possession was on 02.11.2018 i.e. after 36 months of execution of the Page 10f 8 Comp. No. RAJ-RERA-C-2020-3524agreement. Applicant submits that irrespective of deposits with respondent for Rs.11,96,762/-, the possession is not delivered to the applicant. Applicant pleaded for refund of the aforesaid amount and Rs.1 lac of legal expenses were claimed. On the basis of the reply filed by

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top