THE RAJASTHAN REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY, JAIPUR Suo Moto Versus R S Builders and Developers ...Respondent File No. F. 3(430)RJ/RERA/P/2017 Present Shri Shailendra Agarwal, Hon’ble Member (1) Adv Garvit Agarwal, on behalf of the Authority (2) None appeared on behalf of the respondent promoter VEIN Date of Order: 21.09.2021 Ones. WA a ORDER \ea parent gy fi ee In the instant case, the real estate project registered with this on lhdcoh a Authority vide registration No. RAJ/P/2017/369, had an estimated finish date 28.02.2018 as declared by the respondent promoter himself at the time of registration. The estimated completion date having elapsed and the respondent promoter not having informed this Authority about the completion of the project or applying for extension of the project, a notice was issued to the respondent promoter in exercise of the powers conferred on the Authority under section 8, 35, 37, 38 and section 61 of the Real Estate Page No. of 3 \ F.3(430)/2017(Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (hereinafter called ‘the Act’) to show cause why a penalty upto five percent of the estimated cost of the project be not imposed upon the respondent promoter unde