SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

THE RAJASTHAN REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY, JAIPUR (1) Complaint No. RAJ-RERA-C-2019-3372 Lata Chhugani and Ajay Chhugani ... Complainants Versus Arunodaya Builders ... Respondent (2) File No. F.16(17)RJ/RERA/C/2021 Suo Moto Versus Arunodaya Builders ... Respondent Present Shri Nihal Chand Goel, Hon’ble Chairman (1) Adv R.B. Sharma, on behalf of the complainants, through video conference None present on behalf of the respondent Date of Order: 14.02.2022 ORDER The complaint at S.No. (1) above, filed under section 31 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (hereinafter called ‘the Act’), was decided by this Authority vide its order dated 28.06.2021 in the following terms: In view of the above observations and findings, and in exercise of the powers conferred on the Authority under Page 1 of 7 Comp. No. 2019-3372 & File No. F.16(17)/2021 o~section 37 and section 38 of the Act, it is directed that the respondent shall refund the entire deposited amount of Rs. 36,74,500/- along with (a) interest at the prescribed rate of ‘SBI Highest MCLR (7.30%) + 2%’, i.e., 9.30% per annum from 02.11.2017 upto the date the amount is refunded; and (b) the cost of Rs. 5,0

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top