SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

THE RAJASTHAN REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY JAIPUR Comp. No. RAJ-RERA-C-2021-4515 Chinu Sarkar ... Complainant VERSUS KRG Builders ... Respondent Present Hon’ble Shri Salvinder Singh Sohata, Member —eeier singh Sohata, Member 1. Complainant herself present 2. None present on behalf of respondent Dated of Order: 13.05.2022 ORDER Promoter himself or his represent is not present despite service of notice through e-mail on dt. 28.10.2021 and subsequently, notice issued on 11.01.2022. Heard complainant at length and perused the record of the Case carefully. Complainant reiterated the facts mentioned in her application and submits that a flat was booked under Mukhyamantri Jan Awas Yojna 2015 and Rs.50,000/- was remitted on 20.04.2017 with subsequent instalments on 24.06.2017. Accordingly, she had deposited Rs.1.10 lac for the impugned flat under the Scheme of Page 1 of 3 Comp. No. RAJ-RERA-C-2021-4515Shubh Mangal Homes being developed by the respondent developers. She has categorically mentioned before the Authority that a promise was given by the Promoter developer to provide Bank loan at the time of booking of the impugned flat, but later on, was not granted by the lendin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top