SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

BEFORE THE ADJUDICATING OFFICER THE RAJASTHAN REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY, JAIPUR Complaint No.RAJ-RERA-C-2020-3484 Lokendra Singh . Applicant Versus K R P Industries Ltd. Respondent Complaint No.RAJ-RERA-C-2020-3485 Om Prakash Singh Applicant Versus Respondent Present Ci ‘a ' Hon'ble Shri R.S. Kulhari, Adjudicating officer TASS shut Rai and Mr. Samkit Jain, Advocate present on behalf of the applicant. Ms. Unnati Vijay, Advocate present on behalf of the respondent. Date: 18.01.2023 ORDER The facts of the above two complaints are similar in nature and both belong to the same project involving same Page 1 of9 MWe — Comp. No.2020-3484 and 2020-3485issues, therefore, are being disposed of by this common order. Copy of the order be placed on the respective files. 2. The televant facts in nutshell are that each of the complainants booked 2 BHK flats in respondent’s project named as ‘GREEN AALYAWM’, particulars of which, in short, are as under:- S.NO. | Applicant Unit Consideration Deposited Loan from Expected No. (in lacs) Fund Bank delivery of | {in lacs) possession 1 Lokendra | 210] 30.00 24,90,000 | 14.90@9.55% | December Singh | 2017 2 Om 710 | 35.75 25,43,913 | 1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top