SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

File No: F.3(1 817)RJ/RERA/P/2021 Suo Moto through Registrar of Authority ...complainant VERSUS Shri Nandini Complex ...Respondent Present Hon’ble Shri Salvinder Singh Sohata, Member 4. Shri Abhishek Sharma, Law Officer present on behalf of the Authority 2. Advocate Mitesh Rathore & Shruti Rai present on behalf of the Promoter Date of Order: 13.04.2023 ORDER The brief facts of the case are that Promoter applicant has moved an application with reference to administrative directions dated 12.03.2021 for setting aside the ex-parte order dated 22.07.2022 against the Promoter. It is pertinent to mention the aforesaid order dated 22.07.2022 is a common order but Promoter-applicant has moved application dated 46.01.2023 up to extent of their interest only. It is evident that required fee for Page 1 of 6 File No: F.3(537)RJ/RERA/P/2017setting aside the order is deposited by the Promoter on 11.01.2023 and online application Form “x” is already uploaded on the very day. It is averred in aforesaid application that notices issued against the Promoter were un-delivered and notices issued against the Promoter through e-mail were not sent to the official e- mail ID of the Promoter. Ther

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top