SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

THE RAJASTHAN REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY, JAIPUR Complaint No. RAJ-RERA-C-2021-4647 Nitya Nand Yadav ... Complainant Versus Stanford Developers ... Respondent Present Shri Shailendra Agarwal, Hon’ble Member (1) Adv Samkit Jain, on behalf of the complainant (2) None present on behalf of the respondent Date of Order: 17.05.2023 ORDER The aforementioned case was listed before this Court for non-compliance of the order passed by this Court on 20.12.2022. Advocate Samkit Jain, on behalf of the complainant submitted that the aforementioned order was passed by this Court on 20.12.2022 and though a period of five months have passed, the compliance of the order has not been made by the respondent. He further stated that the respondent is wilfully and intentionally not complying with the directions of this Court and prayed for Page No. \ of 4 Comp. No.2021-4647initiating proceedings under section 40 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 216 (hereinafter called ‘the Act’). The counsel on behalf of the complainant also argued before the Court that the provisions of order XXI Rule 41 CPC may be invoked for the production of the respondent before this Court. None

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top