THE RAJASTHAN REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY, JAIPUR Complaint No. RAJ-RERA-C-2021-4647 Nitya Nand Yadav ... Complainant Versus Stanford Developers ... Respondent Present Shri Shailendra Agarwal, Hon’ble Member (1) Adv Samkit Jain, on behalf of the complainant (2) None present on behalf of the respondent Date of Order: 17.05.2023 ORDER The aforementioned case was listed before this Court for non-compliance of the order passed by this Court on 20.12.2022. Advocate Samkit Jain, on behalf of the complainant submitted that the aforementioned order was passed by this Court on 20.12.2022 and though a period of five months have passed, the compliance of the order has not been made by the respondent. He further stated that the respondent is wilfully and intentionally not complying with the directions of this Court and prayed for Page No. \ of 4 Comp. No.2021-4647initiating proceedings under section 40 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 216 (hereinafter called ‘the Act’). The counsel on behalf of the complainant also argued before the Court that the provisions of order XXI Rule 41 CPC may be invoked for the production of the respondent before this Court. None
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.