RAJASTHAN REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY JAIPUR (1)Complaint No: RAJ/RERA/C-2021-4464 Vinay Agarwal ... Complainant VERSUS DC Agarwala and Co. Pvt. Ltd. ...Respondent (2)Complaint No: RAJ/RERA/C-N-2022-5342 Kuldeep Sigh Chandela ... Complainant VERSUS DC Agarwala and Co. Pvt. Ltd. ... Respondent Present Hon’ble Shri Salvinder Singh Sohata, Member or SING Sohata, Member 1. Advcoate Mitesh Rathore and Shruti Rai present on behalf of the Complainant No: di 2. CA.Prateek Rawat and Advocate Abhinav Shekhar on behalf of Complainant No: 2. 3. Advocate Harshal Tholia and Rubal Tholia present on behalf of Promoter-Respondent Date of Order: 28.07.2023 ORDER The cases are having identical facts and similar questions of ey \ 3 Law are involved therein, therefore, the complaints are to be }aa . ffs ; Z AS “disposed of by a common order. The copy of the orders be placed in the respective files. Page 1 of 10 Complaint No: RAJ-RERA-C-2021-4464 & RAJ-RERA-C-N-2022-5342The factual matrix of the Cases is that the Complainants respectively booked their unit in the project “ Unique Vidhyadeep’” bearing registration No: RAJ/P/2017/201. According to the information provided by the Pr