SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

THE RAJASTHAN REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY, JAIPUR COMPLAINT NO.RAJ-RERA-C-2018-2305 Umesh Soni ...Complainant (Applicant) Versus Riddhi Siddhi Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. . — ...Non-applicant Present Shri Nihal Chand Goel, Hon’ble Chairman Shri Rakesh Jain, Hon’ble Member (1) None present for the applicant. (2) Shri Bhuvnesh Nagar, Advocate representative of the non- applicant. Date of order :15.4.2019 ORDER Shri Umesh Soni filed a complaint on 19.5.2018 in form *N’ under Section 31 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA Act, 2016, for short) to which the non-applicant company submitted their reply on 3.7.2018. In the complaint, the applicant has sought relief that he has not yet received possession of the flat which has been delayed by more than three ears . For this, he has taken a loan and paying EMIs as also rent, hence Is for the last three years may be paid/ reimbursed by the builder. L O- Page 1 of 6The applicant and the promoter entered into a written agreement on 21.5.2012, wherein obligations of the parties were detailed out. The applicant has paid a total amount of Rs.26,74,869. As per the agreement, the non-applicant company was t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top