SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

THE RAJASTHAN REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY, JAIPUR COMPLAINT NO.RAJ-RERA-C-2018-2381 Shamim Bano Kayamkhani ..-Complainant (Applicant) Versus Riddhi Siddhi Infraprojects Pvt. Limited —_...Non-applicant Present Shri Nihal Chand Goel, Hon’ble Chairman Shri Rakesh Jain, Hon’ble Member (1) Ms. Shamim Bano Kayamkhani, applicant in person. (2) Shri Bhuvnesh Nagar, Advocate for the non-applicant. Date of order: 15.4.2019 ORDER The applicant Ms. Shamim Bano Kayamkhani filed the present complaint on 30.6.2018, to which the non-applicant company filed their reply on 28.9.2018. In the hearing today, the applicant has reiterated the plea mentioned in the complaint, i.e., to give possession of flat with full amenities along with compensation as per clause 11 of the sale agreement, differential interest charges by bank on housing loan, refund of excess GST and rent claim of Rs.25,000 per month as there is a delay in completion of the project and facilities are not yet fully provided. She has taken a loan from the Bank and is paying EMIs as also rent. However, being not fully familiar with the law, she prays for the relief as permissible under the Real Estate (Regulation & Development)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top