SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
ANILKUMAR DADURAO DHEKLE – Appellant
Versus
RUKHIBEN . – Respondent
C.A. No.-005284-005284 / 2006
12-04-2017
RAJIV SHANKAR DVIVEDI
CIVIL APPEAL NO.5284 OF 2006
REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5284 OF 2006
ANIL KUMAR DADURAO DHEKLE
…Appellant
Versus
RUKHIBEN AND ORS.
…Respondents
J U D G M E N T
R. BANUMATHI, J.
This appeal arises out of the judgment and order dated
16.10.2003 in Civil Revision Application No.1517 of 1983 passed
by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad, dismissing the
revision petition thereby affirming the order of the First Appellate
Court which reversed the order of eviction passed by the trial court.
Vide impugned order, the High Court declined to order eviction on
the ground of default in payment of rent and sub-letting without the
permission of the landlord.
2.
Brief facts which led to filing of this appeal are as follows: The
appellant herein is the owner of the property known as “Radha
Bhuvan” a two storeyed building situated on Vadi Rang Mahal,
Hathia Khan Road, Vadodara City near Alankar Studio and flour
Page No. 1 of 17
Digitally signed by
NARENDRA PRASAD
Date: 2017.04.12
17:25:57 IST
Reason:
Signature Not Verified
CIVIL APPEAL NO.5284 OF 2006
mill. The property consists of ground floor, first floor and second
floor. The ground floor of the suit premises was let out to the first
respondent-defendant No.1 Manilal Ishwarbhai Valand-the original
tenant in the year 1958 on a monthly rent of Rs. 30/-. The original
tenant was running a hair cutting salon in the rented premises
under the name of ‘Excellent Hair Dressing Saloon’. The tenancy
commenced from the 6th day of the month and ended on 5th day of
the following month and for payment of rent, receipt was given
from time to time. The original tenant was not in the habit of paying
the rent regularly, that is, on the due date of each month and he
was in arrears of rent for the period ranging from 06.07.1974 to
05.05.1976, amounting to Rs.660/ for twenty two months. On wilful
default in payment of rent, a notice was duly served upon the
original tenant to make payment of the above arrears within one
month from the date of receipt of notice and the tenant has neither
paid the arrears nor sent any reply. Left with no alternative, the
appellant-plaintiff was constrained to file Rent Suit No.499 of 1978
on 29.09.1978 before the Court of Small Causes Judge at
Vadodara seeking possession of the property and arrears of rent.
During the pendency of the suit, the original tenant Manilal
Ishwarbhai Valand died on 26.11.1979 and his legal
Page No. 2 of 17
CIVIL APPEAL NO.5284 OF 2006
representatives viz., his wife and two sons namely, Dahyalal and
Bhogilal were brought on record as defendant Nos.1/1 to 1/3.
3.
One of the sons of the tenant named Bhogilal independently
runs hair cutting salon on Ajwa Road opposite to Navjivan Society.
Similarly, another son Dahyalal was serving in Alembic Glass
Works for the last 10 to 12 years. Even when tenant-Manilal was
alive, his son Dahyalal never worked with his father and never
helped him in running the shop. After the death of the original
tenant-defendant No.1 Manilal, the appellant-plaintiff found that
one Somabhai Dahiyabhai Valand was inducted into the suit
premises by illegal sub-letting of the tenanted premises so as to
deprive the appellant-plaintiff of his legal right to seek possession
of the suit property. The said Somabhai Dahyabhai Valand was
arrayed as defendant No.2 in the suit (respondent No.4 in this
appeal).
4.
Upon consideration of the evidence adduced by the parties
and the submissions made by the respective parties, the Small
Causes Court allowed the rent suit on the ground of default in
payment of rent by the respondents-defendants and also directed
them to handover peaceful and vacant possession of the property
to the appellant-plaintiff. It was further held by the Small Causes
Page No. 3 of 17
CIVIL APPEAL NO.5284 OF 2006
Court that after the death of the original t