SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ARCHANA GOINDI KHANDELWAL – Appellant
Versus
RAJESH BALKRISHNAN MENON – Respondent


Advocates:
PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

INHERENT JURISDICTION

REVIEW PETITION (C) NO. OF 2022

(@ D. No.

10446

OF 2022)

IN

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No.2939 OF 2022

ARCHANA GOINDI KHANDELWAL Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

RAJESH BALKRISHNAN MENON & ORS. Respondent(s)

O R D E R

Delay condoned.

Application for permission to appear and argue in person

is rejected.

Having carefully gone through the Review Petition, the

order under challenge and the papers annexed therewith, we are

satisfied that there is no error apparent on the face of the

record, warranting reconsideration of the order impugned.

The Review Petition is accordingly dismissed.

Pending application(s) shall stand disposed of

.....................J.

(M.R. SHAH)

.....................J.

(B.V. NAGARATHNA)

NEW DELHI;

NOVEMBER 09, 2022

Digitally signed by

SONIA BHASIN

Date: 2022.11.09

17:19:03 IST

Reason:

Signature Not Verified

ITEM NO.1004 SECTION XIV

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top