SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
DEVA BHAI BHIKHA BHAI – Respondent


Advocates:
D. S. MAHRA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7689 OF 2009

UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Appellant(s)

VERSUS

DEVA BHAI BHIKHA BHAI Respondent(s)

O R D E R

We have heard Mr. S.N. Terdal, learned counsel appearing for

the appellant-Union of India.

We do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned

judgment of the High Court in the facts of the present case.

Accordingly, we find no merit in the appeal and the same is

dismissed. However, the question of law raised is kept open.

......................J

(PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE)

......................J

NEW DELHI;

(AMITAVA ROY)

June 03, 2016.

Digitally signed by

R.NATARAJAN

Date: 2016.06.07

16:39:56 IST

Reason:

Signature Not Verified

ITEM NO.116 COURT NO.3 SECTION XV

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Civil Appeal No(s). 7689/2009

UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Appellant(s)

VERSUS

DEVA BHAI BHIKHA BHAI Respondent(s)

(with int

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top