SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

KARNAIL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


Advocates:
V. P. APPAN

ITEM NO.8 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IV-B

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SANJAY PARIHAR

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 12836/2016

KARNAIL SINGH Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA Respondent(s)

Date : 28-08-2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.

For Petitioner(s)

Mr. Shrikant Dubey,Adv.

Dr. V. P. Appan, AOR

Mr. Shajk Paul,Adv.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the

sole respondent shall be taken by the learned counsel for the

petitioner within a period of four weeks. Dasti in addition is

permitted to be served through the Ld. Standing Counsel

representing the State of Haryana.

List again on 23.10.2017.

SANJAY PARIHAR

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top