SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
RUMA PAL,DR. AR. LAKSHMANAN
KANKAVALI SHIKSHAN SANSTHA – Appellant
Versus
M.R. GAVALI . – Respondent
C.A. No.-007553-007553 / 2005
16-12-2005
VISHWAJIT SINGH
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Page 1 of 6
CASE NO.:
Appeal (civil) 7553 of 2005
PETITIONER:
Kankavali Shikshan Sanstha & Ors.
RESPONDENT:
M.R. Gavali & Ors.
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 16/12/2005
BENCH:
Ruma Pal & Dr. AR. Lakshmanan
JUDGMENT:
J U D G M E N T
(Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No. 12153 OF 2004)
Dr. AR. Lakshmanan, J.
Leave granted.
Kankavali Shikshan Sanstha and two others are the appellants in this appeal.
This appeal was filed against the judgment and final order dated 05.02.2004 passed by
the High Court of Bombay in Writ Petition No. 3000 of 2003 whereby the High Court
allowed the said writ petition of the first respondent herein - Manohar Ramchandra
Gavali by setting aside the order dated 31.03.2003 of the School Tribunal, Kolhapur
and directed that the first respondent shall be entitled to reinstatement in service with
continuity of service and back-wages.
The short facts of the case are as follows:-
Respondent No. 1 - M.R. Gavali was appointed as Assistant Teacher in the
S.M.Junior College w.e.f. 18.06.1994 on purely temporary basis for the academic year
1994-1995 i.e. for the period from 18.06.1994 to 02.05.1995 against the backlog of
SC/ST and NT category. Clauses 2,3,7 & 8 of the appointment order read as follows:-
"2. Your appointment is purely temporary for a period from 18.06.1994 to
02.05.1995 in the leave/deputation vacancy after expiry of the above period
your services shall stand terminated without any notice. OR
3. The terms of your employment and condition of service shall be as laid
down in the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of
Service) Regulation Act, 1977 and the rules made thereunder.
7. Your appointment is conditional subject to the approval of the Education
Department.
8. This post is reserved for Schedule Caste and if candidate of that category
will be available, your service will be terminated."
The Deputy Director of Education approved the said appointment by his letter of
approval dated 04.04.1995.
The appellant-Institution sought to fill up the backlog against the reservation by
publishing advertisement in the newspapers. However, the particular backward class
candidate was not available. On account of non-availability of the ST reserved
category candidate, respondent No.1 - M.R. Gavali was again appointed temporarily on
08.06.1995 for the academic year 1995-96. It was made clear that the said
appointment is liable to be terminated as and when a candidate from the backward
class is made available and that the said appointment was subject to the approval of
the Education Department.
Respondent No.1 submitted an affidavit on 24.11.1995 stating that his
appointment in the 3rd appellant college was only till 02.05.1995 and that his
appointment is totally temporary and on the backlog of SC, ST and NT and only for the
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Page 2 of 6
academic year 1995-96. On 31.01.1996, respondent No.1 again submitted an affidavit
on a bond paper stating that the said appointment is temporary and that he will not
claim any permanent right on the said post. On the basis of the aforesaid affidavit, the
Deputy Director of Education approved the said appointment on totally temporary basis
for the year 1995-96 due to the backlog of SC/ST candidate.
Despite repeated efforts, due to non-availability of SC/ST reserved category
candidate, and as the said post was filled on purely temporary basis for the academic
year 1995-1996, the appellant issued a notice of termination on 26.03.1996 to
respondent No.1 terminating his services at the end of the academic year viz., from
30.04.1996. The termination notice reads thus:-
"Termination Notice
Shri M.R.Gavali
(M.A. B.Ed)
Asst. Teacher
S.M. Jr. College of Sc. & Commerce,
Kankavli, Dist. Sindhudurg
Sub: Termination as Asstt. Teacher after completion of your servic