ASHOK BHAN,S.H. KAPADIA
SIDDHARTHA TUBES LTD. – Appellant
Versus
COMNR.OF CUTSTOMS & CENTRAL EXCISE,.M.P. – Respondent
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Page 1 of 4
CASE NO.:
Appeal (civil) 4247-4248 of 2000
PETITIONER:
Siddhartha Tubes Ltd.
RESPONDENT:
Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise, Indore (MP)
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 16/12/2005
BENCH:
Ashok Bhan & S.H. Kapadia
JUDGMENT:
JUDGMENT
KAPADIA, J.
The short question which arises for determination in these civil appeals
filed by the assessee under section 35-L(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944
(hereinafter referred to as "the Act") is - whether there was value
addition on account of galvanization includible in the assessable value of
m.s. galvanized pipes. In these civil appeals, we are concerned with the
period May 1994 to July 1996.
Appellant was engaged inter alia in the manufacture of m.s. galvanized
pipes. These pipes were made from H.R. coils. The pipes emerging on hydro
testing stage were pickled in acid, washed in running water and galvanized
by dipping in molten zinc.
The appellant filed its classification list claiming that "galvanization"
did not amount to manufacture. The appellant claimed that m.s. galvanized
pipes were non-excisable goods, as the said pipes had been processed out of
duty paid m.s. pipes manufactured in it
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.