SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

G.S. SINGHVI,SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
GEETABEN RATILAL PATEL – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT PRIMARY EDUCATION OFFICER – Respondent


Advocates:
JASPREET GOGIA

Page 1

JUDGMENT

REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 9324 OF 2012

(Arising out of SLP(C)No.7647 of 2011)

GEETABEN  RATILAL PATEL

         … 

APPELLANT

VERSUS

DISTRICT PRIMARY EDUCATION OFFICER          … 

RESPONDENT

J U D G M E N T

SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J.

This appeal is directed against the order dated 

4th November, 2009 passed by the Division Bench of 

Gujarat High Court in L.P.A.No. 1988 of 2009 whereby 

the Division Bench dismissed the said Letters Patent 

Appeal preferred by the appellant and affirmed the 

order   dated   10th  December,   2008   passed   by   learned 

Single   Judge   in   Writ   Petition­Special   Civil 

Application   No.   27730/2007.     In   the   said   writ 

1

Page 2

JUDGMENT

petition the order passed by the Commissioner under 

Section 62 of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal 

Opportunities,   Protection   of     Rights   and   Full 

Participation) Act, 1995 (hereinafter referred to as 

“the Act”)  in case No. 253/2007 was set aside.   

2.

The   main   question   that   arises   for   our 

consideration   is   whether   the   Commissioner   under 

Section 62 of the Act can look  into the leg

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top