B. SUDERSHAN REDDY,SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR, , ,
ALAMELU – Appellant
Versus
STATE REP.BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE – Respondent
REPORTABL
E
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1053 OF 2009
Alamelu & Anr. .. Appellants
VERSUS
State represented by Inspector of Police ..Respondent
WITH
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1063 OF 2009
Sekar & Anr.
.. Appellants
VERSUS
State represented by Inspector of Police ..Respondent
WITH
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1062 OF 2009
Rangasamy & Anr. .. Appellants
VERSUS
State represented by Inspector of Police ..Respondent
J U D G M E N T
SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR, J.
1.
These three appeals are directed against the common
judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Madras
1
dated 6th February, 2008 in Criminal Appeal Nos. 406
and 414 of 2000 confirming the common judgment
passed in S.C. No. 255 of 1997 by the learned Assistant
Sessions Judge, Namakkal dated 28th April, 2000
whereby the trial court had convicted and sentenced the
appellants as under:-
The appellants in Criminal Appeal No. 1053 of 2009 had
been convicted under Sections 366 and 376 read with
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.