SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

B.N. AGRAWAL,G.S. SINGHVI, , ,
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
PUSHPA RANI . – Respondent


Advocates:
B. KRISHNA PRASADPRATIBHA JAIN

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NOS.6934-6946 OF 2005

Union of India

……..Appellant

Versus

Pushpa Rani & Others

……….Respondents

WITH

C.A. NO.6932 OF 2005

Union of India

……… Appellant

Versus

N.D. Kakkar & Others

.…….Respondents

WITH

C.A. NO.6919 OF 2005

All India SC/ST Railway Employees Assn.

……… Appellant

Versus

Union of India & Others

.…….Respondents

WITH

C.A. No.612 of 2006

Union of India

……… Appellant

Versus

Jarnail Singh & Others

.,…….Respondents

WITH

C.A. No._______of 2008

(Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No.5045 OF 2007)

Union of India & Others

………

Petitioners

Versus

Rubi Mazumdar

..…….Respondent

J U D G M E N T

G.S. Singhvi, J.

1.

Whether the policy of reservation of posts for Scheduled Castes/

Scheduled Tribes can be applied at the stage of giving effect to cadre

restructuring exercise undertaken pursuant to letter No.PC-III/2003/CRC/6

dated 9.10.2003 issued by the Railway Board is the question which arises

for determination in the above noted appeals filed against the orders of

Punjab & Haryana High Court which upheld the decision of Chan

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top