NAND LAL AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

B.R. GAVAI, VIKRAM NATH, SANJAY KAROL, JJ
NAND LAL AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Vikas Upadhyay, Renjith B. Marar
For the Respondents: Sumeer Sodhi

Table of Content
1. the court examined the validity of testimonies given the absence of listed names in key documents. (Para 4 , 8 , 9)
2. the delay in lodging the fir and its implications on the credibility of the prosecution case are outlined. (Para 14 , 25)
3. the court stressed the importance of corroborative evidence, particularly in cases with witness interest. (Para 26 , 30)

JUDGEMENT

B.R. GAVAI, J. 1. Leave granted in SLP(Criminal) Nos. 6134-6135 of 2019. 2. These appeals assail the judgment and order dated 11th November 2014 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur, thereby dismissing the appeals filed by the appellants herein and confirming the judgment and order dated 24th May 2008 passed by the Second Additional Sessions Judge, Baloda Bazar, District Digitally signed by Deepak Singh Date: 2023.03.14 13:04:26 IST Reason:

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

B.R. GAVAI, VIKRAM NATH, SANJAY KAROL, JJNAND LAL AND OTHERS – AppellantVersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent

B.R. GAVAI, VIKRAM NATH, SANJAY KAROL, JJ
NAND LAL AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent