SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

STATE OF M.P – Appellant
Versus
RAM SINGH . – Respondent


Advocates:
C. D. SINGH

1

ITEM NO.21 COURT NO.1 SECTION XVI

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 13022/2016

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 12/04/2016

in WP No. 6975/2016 passed by the High Court Of Calcutta)

M/S BINSYS TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Respondent(s)

(with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned

judgment and interim relief and office report)

Date : 10/05/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT

For Petitioner(s)

Ms. Meenakshi Arora,Sr.Adv.

Mr. Snehasish Mukherjee,Adv.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

Heard.

The order under challenge is an order passed by a Single

Judge of the High Court of Calcutta. It is not in dispute that

an appeal lies, against any such order, befor

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top