SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

T.S. THAKUR,SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
M.P. STATE MINING CORPORATION LTD. – Appellant
Versus
SANJEEV BHASKAR . – Respondent


Advocates:
SANTOSH KUMAR TRIPATHIKIRTI RENU MISHRA

Page 1

JUDGMENT

-1

REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

Civil Appeal No.   4950    of 2013

(arising out of SLP(C)No.13053 of 2011)

M.P. STATE  MINING  CORPORATION LTD.

… APPELLANT

Versus

SANJEEV  BHASKAR & ORS.

    … RESPONDENTS

With

Civil Appeal No.  4951   of 2013

(arising out of SLP(C)No.29421 of 2011)

J U D G M E N T

SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J.

Leave granted. These two appeals are preferred by 

the   appellants   M.P.   State   Mining   Corporation   Ltd. 

(hereinafter referred to as the “Mining Corporation”) 

and the State of Madhya Pradesh (hereinafter referred 

to as the “State”)   against the common judgment dated 

20th April, 2011 passed by the Division Bench of Delhi 

High Court in LPA No. 742 of 2010 with LPA No. 284 of 

2011.   By   its   impugned   judgment,   the   Division   Bench 

dismissed   the   appeals   preferred   by   the     Mining 

Corporation   and   the   State   with   costs   quantified   at 

Rs.25,000/­ for each appeal and affirmed the judgment 

Page 2

JUDGMENT

-2

dated 21st September, 2010 passed by the learned Single 

Judge of Delhi High Court.

2.

The factual matrix  of the case is as follows:­

The Government o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top