SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
MARKANDEY KATJU,CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD, , ,
MD.MURTAZA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ASSAM . – Respondent
C.A. No.-007517-007517 / 2011
29-08-2011
RAJIV MEHTACORPORATE LAW GROUP
REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLAE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO.7517__2011
[Arising out of SLP(Civil) Nos. 15141 of 2009]
Md. Murtaza and others
..
Appellants
-vs-
State of Assam and others
..
Respondents
WITH
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7518_2011
[Arising out of SLP(Civil) Nos. 27497 of 2009]
Shaukat Ali and others
..
Appellants
-vs-
State of Assam and others
..
Respondents
O R D E R
1.
Leave granted.
2.
These appeals have been filed against the impugned judgment and
order dated 28.4.2008 passed by the Gauhati High Court in Writ Petition
(Civil) No. 8081 of 2005.
1
3.
The appellants are wholesale vegetable and fruit vendors and were
engaged in selling vegetables and fruits at Machkhowa market, Gauhati in
the State of Assam since 1995. However, they had to vacate their respective
possession of the premises in pursuance to the orders of the Gauhati High
Court. Machkhowa market is situated close to the railway station and is
inside the city and the land thereon has been allotted to the Department of
Handloom and Textiles, Government of Assam for the purpose of
construction of an administrative building. For this purpose it was proposed
to remove the appellants and other wholesale vendors from the Machkhowa
market, and instead a new market has been constructed at Ganeshguri. It
was submitted by the appellants and others that there is not enough space in
the Ganeshguri municipal market for the appellants and others. We are not
referring to the various orders issued by the Gauhati High Court from time to
time.
4.
In one of the counter affidavits filed before us it has been stated that
all parts of the city of Gauhati, including Machkhowa is very congested and
hence the appellants and other wholesellers should not be allowed to do
business of wholesale fruits and vegetables inside the city limits as a large
number of heavy and medium goods vehicles have to enter the city to go to
2
that wholesale market and consequently the area becomes very congested
causing serious traffic problems and also hazard of health and hygiene and
pollution. It is stated that the government of Assam has initiated steps to
develop the fruits and vegetables wholesale market at the outskirts of
Gauhati at Garchuk near the bypass on an area of 8 bighas of land and the
foundation stone of the project market was laid by the Chief Minister on
25.2.2011. It has been further submitted that development work is taking
place at a high speed at Garchuk.
5.
We are of the opinion that the wholesale market of fruits and
vegetables for supplying of these goods to Gauhati and elsewhere should be
at the outskirts or outside the city limits of Gauhati to avoid problems of
traffic congestion, health and hygiene, pollution etc.
6.
Citizens ordinarily do not go to wholesale markets, but they go to
retail markets. Hence if the wholesale market is not situated within the city
limits it will not cause any inconvenience to the public in general. On the
other hand, if such wholesale market is situated within the city limits, there
will be everyday hazards of traffic congestion because of hundreds of
vehicles entering the city carrying goods for the wholesale markets resulting
in traffic congestion, air and noise pollution etc., apart from posing health
3
and hygiene problems. A large number of these goods will be dumped on
the roads causing huge collection of waste and garbage. The rotting goods
may spread diseases. They may also attract stray animals.
7.
Ordinarily everywhere in the world wholesale markets are situated at
the outskirts or outside the city limits. No doubt, the shifting of the shops of
the wholesellers will cause some hardships to some individuals, but it is well
settled that public interest prevails over the private interests. Thus, in
Friends Colony Development Committee vs. State of Orissa AIR 2005 SC 1
(vide para 22) this Court observed