SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HARJIT SINGH BEDI,CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD, , ,
RAM SINGH – Appellant
Versus
CENTRAL BUREAU OF NARCOTICS – Respondent


Advocates:
PRATIBHA JAINSUSHMA SURI

REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS.451-452 OF 2005

RAM SINGH

… APPELLANT

VERSUS

CENTRAL BUREAU OF NARCOTICS

…RESPONDENT

J U D G M E N T

CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD, J.

1.

Appellant aggrieved by his conviction and sentence is

before us with the leave of the Court.

2.

According to the prosecution a secret information led to

recovery of 2.1 Kgms. of opium by PW.7, Abdul Mazid, the

District Opium Officer from a room adjoining the kitchen of a

hotel situated at Sagrana on Neemuch-Chittor road. Appellant

was working as servant in the said hotel. Jagdish Mawal

(PW.6) the then Deputy Commissioner of Narcotics was one of

1

the members of the search party, who had seized the opium,

drawn the seizure memo and recorded the statement (Ex.P/12)

of the appellant on the same day. PW.8, Mahaveer Singh, at

the relevant time was working as Inspector in the Central

Bureau of Narcotics and on 19th July, 1997 itself at 23:45 hrs.,

he was appointed as the Investigating Officer of the case. He

produced the appellant before the Special Judge on 20th July,

1997 and at his request appellant was

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top