SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

A.K. PATNAIK,SWATANTER KUMAR
AVISHEK GOENKA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates:
PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

Page 1

JUDGMENT

REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

IA

NOS.

4,

5,

IA

NOS.

6-8,

IA.

NOS.

9-11,

12,

13,

14

AND

15

IN

WRIT

PETITION

(CIVIL)

NO.265

OF

2011

Avishek Goenka

... Appellant

Versus

Union of India & Anr.

... Respondents

J U D G M

E N T

Swatanter

Kumar,

J .

1.

The applications for impleadment and intervention are

allowed subject to just exceptions. All applications for placing

documents on record are also allowed.

2.

I.A. No. 5 of 2012 has been filed by the Dealers and

Distributors of tinted films in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 265 of 2011

under Order XVIII, Rule 5 of the Supreme Court Rules, 1966

against the dismissal of two interim applications, i.e., seeking

1

Page 2

JUDGMENT

permission to file application for impleadment and application for

modification by the Registrar of this Court vide his Order dated

16th May, 2012.

3.

The learned Registrar vide the impugned order noticed that

application for impleadment was not maintainable inasmuch as

the writ petition in which the application was filed has al

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top