SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD,PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE
VIJAY DHANUKA ETC. – Appellant
Versus
NAJIMA MAMTAJ ETC. – Respondent


Advocates:
BRAJESH KUMAR

Page 1

JUDGMENT

REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS.678-681 OF 2014

(@SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.) NOS.5090-5093 of 2013)

VIJAY DHANUKA ETC.

…APPELLANTS

VERSUS

NAJIMA MAMTAJ ETC.

…RESPONDENTS

J U D G M E N T

CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD,J.

Petitioners have been summoned in a complaint

case for commission of offence under Section 323,

380 and 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian

Penal Code, hereinafter referred to as “the IPC”.

Respondent No. 1 filed a complaint in the Court of

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Jangipur,

Murshidabad on 1st of October, 2011, who after

taking cognizance of the same, transferred the

Page 2

JUDGMENT

complaint to the Court of Judicial Magistrate,

Jangipur, Murshidabad for inquiry and disposal.

According to the allegation in the complaint

petition, accused no.1 Rajdip Dey is sub-broker of

Karvy Stock Broking Limited; whereas other accused

persons are its officials posted at Kolkata and

Hyderabad. The complainant alleged to be its

investor and claimed to have purchased shares from

Karvi Stock Broking Ltd. through the sub-brok

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top