CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD,PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE
VIJAY DHANUKA ETC. – Appellant
Versus
NAJIMA MAMTAJ ETC. – Respondent
Page 1
JUDGMENT
REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS.678-681 OF 2014
(@SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.) NOS.5090-5093 of 2013)
VIJAY DHANUKA ETC.
…APPELLANTS
VERSUS
NAJIMA MAMTAJ ETC.
…RESPONDENTS
J U D G M E N T
CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD,J.
Petitioners have been summoned in a complaint
case for commission of offence under Section 323,
380 and 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian
Penal Code, hereinafter referred to as “the IPC”.
Respondent No. 1 filed a complaint in the Court of
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Jangipur,
Murshidabad on 1st of October, 2011, who after
taking cognizance of the same, transferred the
Page 2
JUDGMENT
complaint to the Court of Judicial Magistrate,
Jangipur, Murshidabad for inquiry and disposal.
According to the allegation in the complaint
petition, accused no.1 Rajdip Dey is sub-broker of
Karvy Stock Broking Limited; whereas other accused
persons are its officials posted at Kolkata and
Hyderabad. The complainant alleged to be its
investor and claimed to have purchased shares from
Karvi Stock Broking Ltd. through the sub-brok
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.