A.K. PATNAIK,SWATANTER KUMAR
NAMIT SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
Page 1
JUDGMENT
REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
WRIT
PETITION
(CIVIL)
NO.
210
of
2012
Namit Sharma
… Petitioner
Versus
Union of India
… Respondent
J U D G M
E N T
Swatanter
Kumar,
J.
1.
The value of any freedom is determined by the extent to
which the citizens are able to enjoy such freedom. Ours is a
constitutional democracy and it is axiomatic that citizens have
the right to know about the affairs of the Government which,
having been elected by them, seeks to formulate some policies of
governance aimed at their welfare. However, like any other
freedom, this freedom also has limitations.
It is a settled
proposition that the Right to Freedom of Speech and Expression
enshrined under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India (for
1
Page 2
JUDGMENT
short ‘the Constitution’) encompasses the right to impart and
receive information. The Right to Information has been stated to
be one of the important facets of proper governance. With the
passage of time, this concept has not only developed in the field of
law, but also has attained new dimensions in it
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.