SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
P.NAZEER ETC. – Appellant
Versus
SALAFI TRUST – Respondent
C.A. No.-003132-003133 / 2016
30-03-2022
E. M. S. ANAM
REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NOs.31323133 OF 2016
P. NAZEER ETC.
…APPELLANT(S)
VERSUS
SALAFI TRUST & ANR. ETC.
…RESPONDENT(S)
J U D G M E N T
V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J.
1.
Aggrieved by a common Judgment delivered by the High Court of
Kerala in two Civil Revision Petitions filed under the proviso to sub
section (9) of Section 83 of the Waqf Act, 1995, reversing the judgment
of the Waqf Tribunal and decreeing the suit of the respondents in
entirety, but dismissing their own suit, the appellants have come up
with the above civil appeals.
1
Digitally signed by
Jayant Kumar Arora
Date: 2022.03.30
17:12:36 IST
Reason:
Signature Not Verified
2.
We have heard Shri R. Basant, learned senior counsel appearing
for the appellants and Shri V. Giri, learned senior counsel appearing
for the private contesting respondents.
3.
The sole appellant in one of the above appeals by name
Shri P. Nazeer was the defendant in a suit O.S No.10 of 2004 filed by
the respondents 1 and 2 herein, on the file of Waqf Tribunal, Kollam.
The three appellants in the other civil appeal were the plaintiffs in O.S
No.9 of 2004 filed on the file of very same Waqf Tribunal, Kollam.
Since the appeals on hand arose out of crosssuits between the same
parties and also since the subject matter of the dispute relates to the
right to management and administration of a mosque and its
properties, it will be easy to appreciate the facts, if presented in a
tabular column:
Suit No.
Names of of
Plaintiffs
Names of of
defendants
Reliefs
sought
Reliefs
granted
by
Waqf
Tribunal
OS No.9
of 2004
1.Salafi Juma
Masjid Mahal
Committee
2. K.M. Syed,
President
3. P. Nazeer,
Secretary
1. Salafi Trust
2. H.E. Ahmed
Thahir Sait,
Vice President
3. A.K. Babu,
Secretary
4. O.M. Khan,
Salabhavan
i)
pass a
decree
declaring that
the document
No.2 issued by
the 6th
Defendant is
1. The relief of
declaration was
rejected.
2. The relief of
permanent
injunction
granted
2
5. S. Rasheed,
Cashier
6. The CEO,
Kerala Waqf
Board,
7.
Kerala
Waqf Board
null and void.
ii)
Issue a
decree
of
permanent
prohibitory
injunction
restraining the
Defendants
No.1 to 4 their
men, agents
and supporters
from
interfering into
or obstructing
the
management
and
administration
of
plaint
schedule
mosque and its
institutions by
the
Plaintiff
Committee.
restraining
defendants 1 to 4
from interfering
with
the
management and
administration of
the
plaint
schedule
waqf
and
its
institutions.
OS No.10
of 2004
1.
Salafi
Trust
2. A.K. Babu
P. Nazeer
(i)
Declaring
that the 2nd
Plaintiff is the
Secretary of the
1st
Defendant
Trust.
(ii) Restraining
the Defendant
or
anybody
under him by
permanent
injunction from
interfering with
1.
Declaration
that the second
plaintiff
A.K.
Babu is the
secretary of Salafi
Trust is granted.
2. But the relief
of
permanent
injunction
is
rejected.
3
administration
& management
of
the
1st
Plaintiff Trust
and scheduled
property by the
2nd
Plaintiff
as the Secretary
of
the
1st
Plaintiff.
4.
It is necessary to bring on record, before proceeding further, that
document No.2 in respect of which the appellants herein sought a
declaration of nullity, in their own suit O.S No.9 of 2004, was a
certificate issued by the Chief Executive Officer of Kerala Waqf Board
dated 24.03.2004 in favour of Salafi Trust. The said certificate reads
as follows:
“This is to certify that the Salafi Trust, Mattanchery, Cochin
2 in Kochi Taluk, Ernakulam District, Kerala State and its
properties having 17 cents comprised in Survey No.527/4
within the limit of Ambalappuzha Taluk Alappuzha District
have been registered before the Kerala Waqf board as
required under Section 36 of the Waqf Act, 1995 being its
registration No.6406